Wednesday, December 14, 2011

'Comic Sans Project' Seeks to Save the Web's Most Hated Font

Media_http9mshcdncomw_acedi

stuff you need to know

A History of Western Typefaces [INFOGRAPHIC]

The Fontography Series is supported by join.me, the easiest way to have an online meeting. join.me lets you instantly share your screen with anyone, for free. Use it to collaborate, demo, show off — the possibilities are endless. Try it today.

You see approximately 490,000 words every day — and that’s just on the web. If the designers behind those websites are any good, they put a lot of thought into the typefaces they use on each page.

Fonts don’t just display letters as words and sentences. They convey emotion, attitude and tone. They call out what information is most important and help you navigate through a site.

Hate Comic Sans? You’re not alone. There are plenty of reasons for despising the font, according to many fontographers and font enthusiasts. Love Helvetica? You’re not alone — many designers love its clean and simple aesthetic.

The infographic below presents a history of typefaces, incorporating fun tidbits from tech, pop culture and the web. Do you know what font the Google logo is? What about Facebook? Take a peek below to learn these and more.

Infographic design by Nick Sigler

Series supported by join.me


The Fontography Series is supported by join.me, the easiest way to have an online meeting. Named one of Time magazine’s best websites of 2011, join.me lets you share your screen so you can instantly get together, collaborate, demo, show off and more. Plus, it’s totally free. How will you use it? Check it out today.

WordPress 3.3 Now Available for Download

Self hosted users: time to update

Google Extends Free Gmail Calls in the US and Canada to 2012

Media_http7mshcdncomw_mbgch

Got your google phone number yet?

Tuesday, December 13, 2011

Firefox faces uncertain future as Google deal apparently ends | ZDNet

Firefox faces uncertain future as Google deal apparently ends

By | December 2, 2011, 5:40am PST

Summary: It hasn’t been a good year for Firefox. Mozilla has lost share to Google, it’s lost the loyalty of enterprise customers, and it’s lost key talent. And a deal with Google that supplied 84% of its revenue last year was scheduled to end in November. Can Firefox avoid a slide into irrelevance?

It hasn’t been a good year for Mozilla and its flagship product, the Firefox browser.

Firefox continues to lose share to Google Chrome. Statistics from Net Market Share show the decline, with Firefox plunging from 25% to 22% and Chrome rising from under 5% to more than 18% during the last two years.

Firefox is now on an accelerated development schedule that has alienated enterprise customers.

One of its key managers, Mike Shaver, left in September. How important was he to the developers? The current version of the Firefox road map still includes a big bold TODO item under the “How to ship faster” heading:

Process change suggestions (w/Shaver)

And the deal with Mozilla’s biggest financial backer is in question. A search partnership with Google has historically been Mozilla’s greatest source of income. In its most recent financial statement, prepared in August and published recently online (see this PDF copy), the Mozilla Foundation won’t even mention Google’s name:

The Corporation has a contract with a search engine provider for royalties which expires November 2011. Approximately 84% and 86% of royalty revenue for 2010 and 2009, respectively, was derived from this contract.

In the accompanying FAQ, Mozilla provides a cryptic non-answer to the question:

What is the status of the organization’s search partnerships?

We currently have partnerships with a number of search providers that differ by market. Our largest contract, with Google, comes up for renewal in November. We have every confidence that search partnerships will remain a solid generator of revenue for Mozilla for the foreseeable future.

Back in July, I sent an e-mail to Mozilla PR with a number of questions about the Mozilla-Google financial agreement.

  • The Mozilla-Google search arrangement ends in 2011, according to the most recent public disclosure I was able to find. Is that date accurate?
  • Are Mozilla and Google in discussions to extend that arrangement further, and if so would it be under revised terms?
  • Has Mozilla made contingency plans in the event that Google decides to end or scale back its support?

A Mozilla spokesperson replied with a link to the 2009 financial FAQ, which contained equally vague language: “We believe that search providers will remain a solid generator of revenue for Mozilla for the foreseeable future.”

On December 1, I asked Mozilla PR for news on whether the agreement with Google was renegotiated or whether the foundation has any further update to that FAQ. I received a crisp reply:

We currently do not have an update to share.

In 2010, 84% of Mozilla’s $123 million in revenue came directly from Google. That’s roughly $100 million in funds that will vanish or be drastically cut if the deal is either not renewed or is renegotiated on terms that are less favorable to Mozilla.

When the original three-year partnership deal was signed in 2008, Chrome was still on the drawing boards. Today, it is Google’s most prominent software product, and it is rapidly replacing Firefox as the alternative browser on every platform.

Back in March, I suggested that Firefox won’t survive:

So where does that leave Firefox? It doesn’t have an app ecosystem or a loyal core of developers. Extensions? Those were worth bragging about in 2005, but in 2012 the story is apps. Businesses and consumers will want to use the same browser that powers their installed apps. In the PC space, that means Google or Microsoft. It doesn’t leave room for a third player.

Mozilla knows this. The last item on its latest roadmap highlights the need to plan for a future where Desktop, Mobile and Web Apps run on a common platform” and “to design and architect towards this eventual outcome.” But the last line notes that “implementation of this is not a priority.”

With its biggest source of revenue likely to dry up and a platform that is under attack from Microsoft and Google, how long will it take before Firefox slides into irrelevance?

Related posts:

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Ed Bott is an award-winning technology writer with more than two decades' experience writing for mainstream media outlets and online publications.

Disclosure

Ed Bott

Ed Bott is a freelance technical journalist and book author. All work that Ed does is on a contractual basis.

Since 1994, Ed has written more than 25 books about Microsoft Windows and Office. Along with various co-authors, Ed is completely responsible for the content of the books he writes. As a key part of his contractual relationship with publishers, he gives them permission to print and distribute the content he writes and to pay him a royalty based on the actual sales of those books. Ed's books are currently distributed by Que Publishing (a division of Pearson Education) and by Microsoft Press.

On occasion, Ed accepts consulting assignments. In recent years, he has worked as an expert witness in cases where his experience and knowledge of Microsoft and Microsoft Windows have been useful. In each such case, his compensation is on an hourly basis, and he is hired as a witness, not an advocate.

Ed does not own stock or have any other financial interest in Microsoft or any other software company. He owns 500 shares of stock in EMC Corporation, which was purchased before the company's acquisition of VMWare. In addition, he owns 350 shares of stock in Intel Corporation, purchased more than two years ago. All stocks are held in retirement accounts for long-term growth.

Ed does not accept gifts from companies he covers. All hardware products he writes about are purchased with his own funds or are review units covered under formal loan agreements and are returned after the review is complete.

Biography

Ed Bott

Ed Bott is an award-winning technology writer with more than two decades' experience writing for mainstream media outlets and online publications. He's served as editor of the U.S. edition of PC Computing and managing editor of PC World; both publications had monthly paid circulation in excess of 1 million during his tenure. He is the author of more than 25 books on Microsoft Windows and Office, including the recently released Windows 7 Inside Out.

Related Discussions on TechRepublic

Did you know you can take part in these discussions with your ZDNet membership?

Talkback Most Recent of 110 Talkback(s)

  • If you sleep with the enemy, expect to be stabbed in the back
    Google is the enemy. The corporation is your enemy, and my enemy. The sooner you realise, the better.

    Collaborating with the enemy, as Mozilla/Firefox has done for so long, is a potentially fatal mistake.

    ZDNet Gravatar
    Tim Acheson
    2nd Dec
  • RE: Firefox faces uncertain future as Google deal apparently ends
    @Tim Acheson

    He says, on his PC or Mac developed by the evil corporation as he answers his iphone developed by the evil corporation as he drive his Chevy Volt also developed by the evil corporation.

    Go build a log cabin in the woods if you don't like business innovation.

    ZDNet Gravatar
    gatormba2003
    2nd Dec
  • Censorship abatement therapy
    @gatormba2003 The means by which we communicate should not be exclusively owned by for-profit corporations. Business innovation is fine and dandy, but genuine open source technologies are essential to keep the would-be censors at bay.

    Corporations are not evil, any more than sharks are evil. They're just doing what they are designed to do: mercilessly eat everything in sight. Firefox isn't a "cabin in the woods," it's a shark cage.

    ZDNet Gravatar
    doctordawg
    2nd Dec
  • RE: Firefox faces uncertain future as Google deal apparently ends
    @gatormba2003

    you're wrong in one respect... his Chevy volt wasn't developed by an evil corporation... it was developed by the government.

    ZDNet Gravatar
    mcmurphy510
    3rd Dec
  • Been using FF Beta RC version for the past few months.
    If you thought FF8 is fast, FF9 is even better. And I don't even participate in the Aurora channel where FF10 is being developed or the Nightly channel where FF11 is being built into a usable state.

    Mozilla has been working to respond to Chrome's growing share. I don't believe Chrome will be in the "Lead" for very long. Not that it matters anyway. Firefox will never quite be irrelevant, there is always room for OSS which Firefox is.

    ZDNet Gravatar
    ZazieLavender
    2nd Dec
  • RE: Firefox faces uncertain future as Google deal apparently ends
    @ZazieLavender

    Actually, I have been using nightly in its beta stage and its not that bad.
    Put it this way, it converted me from IE9 to Firefox. And now I can't even believe that i managed to put up with Microsoft's IE fails for so long. the fact that a beta edition of Firefox is more stable than the actual release of IE9, that says it all.

    ZDNet Gravatar
    mad-doggie
    3rd Dec
  • RE: Firefox faces uncertain future as Google deal apparently ends
    @ZazieLavender Isn't Chromium open source?
    ZDNet Gravatar
    paulfx1
    4th Dec
  • RE: Firefox faces uncertain future as Google deal apparently ends
    @Tim Acheson I guess that without Google,Firefox wouldn't have been so succesful.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    anto31
    2nd Dec
  • RE: If you sleep with the enemy, expect to be stabbed in the back
    @Tim Acheson wrote:
    "Google is the enemy. The corporation is your enemy, and my enemy

    While corporations have way, WAY too much influence with the government, they do create products and services that are useful. And there are lots of choices today. For example, if Google's Chrome browser is not your cup of tea (it does have some useful features), one can choose a derivative browser such as Chromium or SRWare Iron. Or another browser altogether, like Firefox, Opera, IE or Safari. And just remember that there is a Mozilla Corporation too. It's a wholly owned subsidiary of the Mozilla Foundation.

    P.S. There will likely be one or more corporations that keep Mozilla going, with or without Google. Perhaps, Microsoft and IBM (if Mozilla gets their act together for enterprise users).

    ZDNet Gravatar
    Rabid Howler Monkey
    2nd Dec
  • RE: Firefox faces uncertain future as Google deal apparently ends
    This article is as ridiculous as the "Flash is dead" articles. Mozilla Firefox is still incredibly popular, despite Google Chrome eating away at it's share.

    Firefox supports HTML5 just as well as IE and Chrome does. In other word, future Web Apps will work just as well using it. Yes Firefox will likely become less popular but it won't become irrelevant.

    You can opt-out of Firefox auto-updates. Enterprise doesn't use extensions anyway.

    ZDNet Gravatar
    bradavon
    3rd Dec
  • RE: Firefox faces uncertain future as Google deal apparently ends
    Maybe they'll make a deal with Bing next. But would Google really want that?
    ZDNet Gravatar
    gorash0
    2nd Dec
  • RE: Firefox faces uncertain future as Google deal apparently ends
    @gorash0 The other question is, "Would Microsoft really want that?" Granted, bing is a potential profit center for Microsoft, while Internet Explorer doesn't seem so, but still, Microsoft isn't building IE just so we can use it to download a better browser, even if that's how I use it.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    P.F. Bruns
    2nd Dec
  • ZDNet Blogger

    They already made a deal with Bing
    @gorash0

    But there's no way that anyone will want to pay what Google has been paying for the last three years. It was over $100 million in 2010.

    http://www.zdnet.com/blog/btl/microsofts-bing-launches-better-firefox-integration-amid-google-mozilla-renewal-talk/61931

    ZDNet Gravatar
    Ed Bott
    2nd Dec
  • Gates sometimes liked competition -- for example, he did not want Apple to
    @Ed Bott: ... die and even bought $150 million worth of Apple's non-voting (privileged) shares. While this could be coming from from his "love-hate relationships" with Jobs, Gates could sometimes feel the same in more cases than this particular one.

    And though Gates now has (formally) nothing to do with administering Microsoft, this policy might have influence. Ballmer might help Firefox to survive for the sake of keeping competition to Google.

    ZDNet Gravatar
    dderss
    2nd Dec
  • RE: Firefox faces uncertain future as Google deal apparently ends
    @Ed Bott

    Are you sure? M$ paid billions over market value for Skype. HP paid at least twice what Palm was worth. 3Par? Corporate bigs are cash rich and common sense poor. It would be sad to see Firefox lose funding. They pay for some $20 million in grants per year. They are a very generous non-profit. I genuinely hope they weather this recent management glitch. I mean seriously, they could probably eke by at this point on $40 million revenue if they stopped buying new furniture and computers, but I hope they don't need to.

    ZDNet Gravatar
    tkejlboom
    2nd Dec
    • Flagged

Talkback - Tell Us What You Think

Saturday, December 10, 2011